Unbaiting the mousetrap (originally written Jan. 29, 2017)
President Donald Trump has reversed that old adage, "If
you build a better mousetrap, the world will beat a path to your door," by
asking Congress to fund the Mexico Friendship
Wall (my name for the Mexican border wall). He is just fulfilling one of
the campaign promises that got him elected by 62 million people or 47% of the
voting population in November. Republicans knew he would do it, but those on
the far Left thought the wall was just one of his many campaign slogans. This
first week in office has shown many 'doubting Thomases' that the President
takes his promises, seriously. I've heard many analogies about illegal
immigration. One is, "What if your daughter was getting married and a
couple hundred uninvited guests turned up, insisted on consuming your salmon
fumé and drinking your champagne that cost you $40/bottle? Then they demanded
to dance the first dance with the bride and when the gifts were opened grabbed
a few of them for themselves, and afterwards, when the festivities ended,
decided to camp out in the banquet hall and refused to pay their fair share of
the costs?"
Another was, "What if you were watching the Superbowl
with your family in your living room and a dozen strangers broke down your
front door, plopped themselves down on your sofa and insisted you change the
channel after having left their dirty clothes and muddy footprints on your new
shag carpet, after which they commandeered your bedroom and told you and the
missus to sleep on the floor...and in the morning, they announced that they
were staying on for a few years?"
Most of us would probably object, strenuously, citing our
right of private property. Asserting our right to a strong national border is
much the same. It's up to us to refuse entry to anyone not having an invitation
(legal documents). The U.S. is one of the most generous countries in the world
when it comes to accepting legal immigrants - a million a year in fact - some
having waited years for the privilege of a coveted permanent resident visa. These
are, for the most part, non-Caucasian immigrants, I might add, from all over
the world. As I said, the process is a long one. Sometimes it takes years to
complete, and while they've been waiting, hundreds of thousands have 'crashed
the party' by sneaking through our southern border, after which they've thumbed
their noses at our immigration laws and promptly declared themselves 'asylum
seekers' to our Border Patrol.
During the Obama years, this was the preferred method of
gaining access to the USA, as border officials were required to allow the
'asylum seekers' to stay here while a court date was arranged for them. Most
simply ignored the court order and disappeared into the woodwork. Then there
are the 'visa overstayers' - people who came to the U.S. with a legal tourist
visa and decided they liked it here, and stayed...permanently. They too, have disappeared
into the woodwork. The estimated size of that group is 42% of the total illegal
immigrant population, maybe five million people.
Those supporting open borders don't seem to think this is a
problem. They view our country like some kind of open bar with a free
smorgasbord, and that any one of us who would dare to criticize these underprivileged people is
some kind of bully, statist or racist. We are vilified for wanting law or order
in our immigration system. Our new President is not going to make many friends
with the 65 million people that voted for Hillary Clinton with his executive
orders, nor is he going to become bosom buddies with Mexican President Nieto by
building the Friendship Wall OR when he signs an executive order that cuts off
U.S. aid to those countries that will not take back citizens that have
committed crimes here. The rubber will meet the road soon, and Americans will,
once again, choose sides on the immigration debate. I can only hope that our
Congress will act swiftly, in a bi-partisan fashion, to enact a new,
comprehensive immigration law that will protect our borders, ensure the safety
of our citizens and, yes, treat the general non-criminal illegal immigrant population
with civility while we find a solution for the 11-13 million of them who have not
broken any other laws and want to remain here.
Stephan Helgesen is a
retired U.S. diplomat, now author and political strategist. He has written over
600 articles and six books on politics, economics and social trends. He can be
reached at stephan@stephanhelgesen.com
No comments:
Post a Comment